← All posts

AI · 6 min read

AI for churches and nonprofits: what works and what doesn't

By Adam Hardegree ·

Written with AI assistance and checked against my published services and prices.

A lot of small organizations run on goodwill and not much else. Churches. Food pantries. Nonprofits where the "staff" is one paid person and forty volunteers.

So when someone in that world asks me whether they should "start using AI," I know what they're really asking. They're not asking about the technology. They're asking: is this going to help us serve people, or is it going to make us feel like a corporation?

Fair question. Here's my answer, split into the part that works and the part that doesn't.

What works

The administrative grind nobody signed up for

Nobody volunteers at a church because they love formatting the weekly bulletin. Nobody joins a nonprofit board to spend Sunday night turning meeting notes into an email. But that work still has to happen, and it eats the hours that should go to actual people.

That's the part AI is good at.

A transcription tool like Otter on every board meeting means your secretary walks out with notes and action items already written. A ChatGPT or Claude account — the $20 plan — with your past newsletters uploaded will draft this week's announcement email in your voice in about thirty seconds. You still read it, fix it, and hit send. You just don't start from a blank page at 9pm.

For a volunteer-run office, that's not a luxury. That's the difference between the newsletter going out and the newsletter not going out.

Answering the same questions for the hundredth time

Every nonprofit has a short list of questions it answers constantly. What time is the service? How do I sign up to volunteer? Where does my donation go? Is the building wheelchair accessible?

You don't need anything fancy here. A clear FAQ page on your site handles most of it. But if those questions are flooding one volunteer's inbox, a simple custom assistant trained on your real answers can field the easy ones and leave the human to handle the conversations that actually need a human. That's the whole point — push the routine stuff down so people have time for the stuff that isn't routine.

Grant writing and donor letters — as a first draft

This one comes with a fence around it, so read the next section too. But for a stretched development person, AI is a real help getting a grant narrative or a thank-you letter from nothing to a rough draft. It organizes the facts you feed it. It does not invent the facts. You bring the numbers and the story; it helps you arrange them.

What doesn't

Anything that's supposed to sound like you care

Here's the line I won't cross: do not let a machine write the message that's supposed to come from the heart.

A condolence note. A thank-you to a major donor. A pastor's message to a grieving family. The moment someone can tell that the warm words were generated, the warmth is gone — and worse, they start to wonder what else was automated. You can lose years of trust in one form letter that feels like a form letter.

AI can help you draft the bulletin. It should never draft the sympathy.

Anything involving private information

Nonprofits and churches hold sensitive information — giving records, prayer requests, counseling notes, the names of families getting help. Do not paste that into a public chatbot. Ever. It's not that the sky will fall; it's that you owe those people discretion, and free AI tools are not the place to keep a confidence.

If you want AI anywhere near private data, that's a setup conversation, not a "just try ChatGPT" conversation. Keep the sensitive stuff out until someone has helped you do it properly.

Replacing the volunteer relationship

The temptation, once the tools start saving time, is to automate the human contact too. Don't. The reason people show up to a small nonprofit instead of clicking "donate" on a national one is that someone knew their name. Spend the hours you save being more human, not less. If AI frees up your one staff person to make ten real phone calls a week, you've won. If it replaces the phone calls, you've lost the thing that made you worth supporting.

The rule of thumb

Use AI for the work nobody became a volunteer to do. Keep it away from the work that is the mission. The bulletin, the meeting notes, the routine inbox — automate freely. The relationship, the comfort, the confidence — that stays human.

Get that line right and AI gives a tiny team the reach of a much bigger one without costing them the soul that made people care in the first place.

I wrote up how I set up AI for churches and nonprofits, including the parts I won't automate. If you'd like to find your office's biggest time leaks first, the free AI Time-Leak Checklist is a good place to start.


Run a church or nonprofit and not sure where that line falls for your office? The half-day AI workflow audit is $750: I watch how the office really runs, and you get a written plan of what's worth automating and in what order. Book a free call to talk it through first.